Be part of our day by day and weekly newsletters for the newest updates and unique content material on industry-leading AI protection. Be taught Extra
Unpatched methods are a ticking time bomb. Fifty-seven percent of cyberattack victims acknowledge that obtainable patches would have prevented breaches, but almost one-third admit failing to behave, compounding the danger.
Ponemon research reveals organizations now take an alarming common of 43 days to detect cyberattacks, even after a patch is launched, up from 36 days the earlier 12 months. In line with the Verizon 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report, attackers’ capability to use vulnerabilities surged by 180% from 2023 to 2024.
Power firefighting makes guide or partially automated patching overly burdensome, additional pushing patching down groups’ precedence lists.
Relying on guide or partially automated patching methods is taken into account too time-consuming, additional lowering patching to the underside of a staff’s motion merchandise listing. That is consistent with an Ivanti study that discovered that almost all (71%) of IT and safety professionals assume patching is overly complicated, cumbersome and time-consuming.
In the case of patching, complacency kills
Attackers aggressively exploit legacy Widespread Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), usually ten or extra years previous.
A certain signal of how efficient attackers’ tradecraft is turning into at concentrating on legacy CVEs is their success with vulnerabilities in some instances, 10-plus years previous. A certain signal that attackers are discovering new methods to weaponize previous vulnerabilities is mirrored within the startling stat that 76% of vulnerabilities leveraged by ransomware had been reported between 2010 and 2019. The misalignment between IT and safety groups compounds delays, with 27% missing cohesive patch methods and almost 1 / 4 disagreeing on patch schedules. One of many surprising advantages of automating patch administration is breaking the deadlock between IT and safety relating to managing the patch workload.
“Sometimes, on common, an enterprise could patch 90% of desktops inside two to 4 weeks, 80% of Home windows servers inside six weeks and solely 25% of Oracle Databases inside six months from patch launch date”, writes Gartner of their current report, “We’re not patching our way out of vulnerability exposure.” The report states that “the chilly, arduous actuality is that nobody is out patching menace actors at scale in any measurement group, geography or {industry} vertical.”
Ring deployment: proactive protection at scale
Each unpatched endpoint or menace floor invitations attackers to use it. Enterprises are shedding the patching race, which motivates attackers much more.
Within the meantime, patching has turn into exponentially tougher for safety and IT groups to handle manually. Roughly a decade in the past, ring deployment started to depend on Microsoft-dominated networks. Since then, ring deployments have proliferated throughout on-premise and cloud-based patch and threat administration methods. Ring deployment supplies a phased, automated technique, shrinking attacker home windows and breach dangers.
Ring deployment rolls out patches incrementally via fastidiously managed levels or “rings:”
- Check Ring (1%): Core IT groups rapidly validate patch stability.
- Early Adopter Ring (5–10%): A broader inner group confirms real-world compatibility.
- Manufacturing Ring (80–90%): Enterprise-wide rollout after stability is conclusively confirmed.
Ivanti’s current launch of ring deployment is designed to provide safety groups higher management over when patches will probably be deployed, to which methods and the way every sequence of updates will probably be managed. By addressing patching points early, the purpose is to reduce dangers and cut back and get rid of disruptions.

Ring deployment crushes MTTP, ends reactive patching chaos
Counting on outdated vulnerability rankings to steer patch administration methods solely will increase the danger of a breach as enterprises race to maintain up with rising patch backlogs. That’s usually when patching turns into cybersecurity’s infinite nightmare, with attackers seeking to capitalize on the numerous legacy CVEs that stay unprotected.
Gartner’s take of their current report “Modernize windows and third-party application patching” makes the purpose brutally clear, exhibiting how conventional patching strategies routinely fail to maintain tempo. In distinction, enterprises embracing ring deployment are getting measurable outcomes. Their analysis finds ring deployment achieves a “99% patch success inside 24 hours for as much as 100,000 PCs,” leaving conventional strategies far behind.
Throughout an interview with VentureBeat, Tony Miller, Ivanti’s VP of enterprise companies, emphasised that “Ivanti Neurons for Patch Administration and implementing Ring Deployment is a vital a part of our Buyer Zero journey.” He mentioned the corporate makes use of a lot of its personal merchandise, which permits for a fast suggestions loop and offers builders perception into prospects’ ache factors.
Miller added: “We’ve examined out Ring Deployment internally with a restricted group, and we’re within the means of rolling it out organization-wide. In our take a look at group, we have now benefited from deploying patches based mostly on real-world threat, and making certain that updates don’t interrupt worker productiveness–a major problem for any IT group.”
VentureBeat additionally spoke with Jesse Miller, SVP and director of IT at Southstar Financial institution, about leveraging Ivanti’s dynamic Vulnerability Danger Score (VRR), an AI-driven system constantly recalibrated with real-time menace intelligence, reside exploit exercise, and present assault knowledge.
Miller acknowledged clearly: “This is a vital change for us and the whole {industry}. Judging a patch based mostly on its CVSS now’s like working in a vacuum. When judging how impactful one thing will be, it’s a must to take all the pieces from present occasions, your {industry}, your surroundings and extra into the equation. In the end, we’re simply making wiser choices as we’re not disregarding CVSS scoring; we’re merely including to it.”
Miller additionally highlighted his staff’s prioritization technique: “We’ve got been capable of concentrate on prioritizing Zero-Day and Precedence patches to get out first, in addition to something being exploited reside within the wild. Utilizing patch prioritization helps us get rid of our largest threat first in order that we will cut back our assault floor as rapidly as potential.”
By combining ring deployment and dynamic VRR expertise, Ivanti Neurons supplies enterprises with structured visible orchestration of incremental patch rollouts. This strategy sharply reduces Imply-Time-to-Patch (MTTP), accelerating patches from focused testing via full deployment and considerably lowering the publicity home windows that attackers exploit.

Evaluating Ivanti Neurons, Microsoft Autopatch, Tanium and ServiceNow: Key strengths and gaps
When choosing enterprise patch administration options, obvious variations emerge amongst main suppliers, together with Microsoft Autopatch, Tanium, ServiceNow and Ivanti Neurons.
Microsoft Autopatch depends on ring deployment however is restricted to Home windows environments, together with Microsoft 365 functions. Ivanti Neurons expands on this idea by overlaying a broader spectrum, together with Home windows, macOS, Linux and numerous third-party functions. This allows enterprise-wide patch administration for organizations with large-scale, various infrastructure.
Tanium stands out for its sturdy endpoint visibility and detailed reporting options, however its infrastructure necessities sometimes align higher with resource-intensive enterprises. In the meantime, ServiceNow’s power lies in workflow automation and IT service administration integrations. Executing precise patches usually calls for important further customization or third-party integrations.
Ivanti Neurons goals to distinguish by integrating dynamic threat assessments, phased ring deployments and automatic workflows inside a single platform. It immediately addresses widespread enterprise challenges in patch administration, together with visibility gaps, operational complexity and uncertainty about vulnerability prioritization with real-time threat assessments and intuitive visible dashboards.

Reworking patch administration right into a strategic benefit
Patching alone can’t get rid of vulnerability publicity. Gartner’s analysts proceed to emphasize the need of integrating compensating controls, together with endpoint safety platforms (EPP), multifactor authentication, and community segmentation to bolster safety past primary patching.
Combining ring deployment with built-in compensating controls which can be a part of a broader zero-trust framework ensures safety, permits IT groups to shrink publicity home windows, and higher handle cyber dangers.
Ivanti’s strategy to ring deployment incorporates real-time threat assessments, automated remediation workflows, and built-in menace administration, immediately aligning patch administration with broader enterprise resilience methods. The design choice to make it a part of Neurons for Patch Administration delivers the size enterprises want to enhance threat administration’s real-time visibility.
Backside line: Integrating ring deployment with compensating controls and prioritization instruments transforms patch administration from a reactive burden to a strategic benefit.
Source link
