In 2017, the Courtroom of Justice tossed out the Fee’s judgement, saying that the Common Courtroom didn’t look at all of Intel’s arguments because it was required to do. “The Courtroom due to this fact units apart the judgment of the Common Courtroom on account of that failure in its evaluation,” it concluded, referring the case again to the Common Courtroom “to look at, within the mild of the arguments put ahead by Intel, whether or not the rebates at situation are able to proscribing competitors.”
However that wasn’t the tip of it.
In 2022, the Common Courtroom, after completely reviewing the arguments from either side, dominated, “the evaluation carried out by the Fee is incomplete and, in any occasion, doesn’t make it potential to determine to the requisite authorized customary that the rebates at situation have been able to having, or have been prone to have, anticompetitive results, which is why the Common Courtroom annuls the decision.”
